![]() |
| Sammy kicked down his stumps |
The West Indies folded in the first session, doubling their score and losing five wickets but setting Australia a target well less than ODI pace of 192 off 64 overs. Harris took two of the five wickets and the other quicker men took one each. Only Kemar Roach lasted any length of time as the hosts surrendered their advantage in a meek batting performance before Harris bowled him in the same way he had Narsingh Deonarine lbw, with a vicious off cutter. Darren Sammy was out in bizarre fashion, playing with soft hands to drop the ball at his feet and as the ball ran back to the stumps, his attempted kick sent it cannoning into the stumps. It adds to the back catalogue of Shane Watson dismissals that only the big blond can conjure. He may be unlucky in injury, reckless in running but he picks up wickets with luck that should be shared around rather than concentrated in one player.
![]() |
| Roach had no luck |
Prosperous in luck, they survived and got Australia to three figures as the Australia innings was purring to victory still early in the last session. The match took a sudden, painful turn for Australia when the part-time off spinner Deonarine tore through the top half of the batting order, removing Watson, Cowan, Ricky Ponting and Michael Clarke in a five over spell. Matt Wade and Michael Hussey added 37, before and after a rain interruption which had the Australians nervous enough that Hussey set his foot firmly on the accelerator. Both were out to Roach as the target shrank: Wade cutting to Bishoo in the deep and Hussey bowled by one that came back at him from outside off stump, but Harris and Ben Hilfenhaus, both batting above Peter Siddle, managed the final three required as the light faded and the umpires held discussions. A perverse ICC ruling passed down to umpires was narrowly avoided.
![]() |
| Hilfenhaus & Harris celebrate the win |
It counted today.
For the West Indies, Sammy must ensure that this isn't seen only from the angle of defeat. Darren Bravo came back with better form here and the returning Kirk Edwards and Shiv Chanderpaul all stiffened the batting line up. His bowlers did their job for large parts of this match. The issue of indifferent batting in the second innings and the over use of bouncers at the Australian tail are the areas which need addressing. The burning issue, however, is for the West Indies Board to answer. How Sunil Narine was in India after bamboozling the Australians in the ODI and T20 matches is a matter of grave concern. Cricketers must always be available to represent their nation or nations. No private contract should, in any circumstances, outweigh the priority of international cricket responsibilities. Deonarine's four second innings wickets are the knife to drive into the lack of guts of the WICB, as he is at best a part-timer in the Andrew Symonds mode. Three wickets short of a victory screams of the ineptitude of not playing the bowler who even Mike Hussey said publicly was concerning the Australians.
Ryan Harris was named MOTM for his five wickets and heroic first innings 68 not out in a match which had many heroes but few stand out performances. Three more wickets might have given the award to Shiv Chanderpaul.
The second Test begins in Port of Spain on Sunday.



I haven't seen a ball of this test but there are great signs from both teams. Not least of which is WI's disappointment to what what they no longer accept as being par for the course; a capitulation with the bat.
ReplyDeleteClarke's aggressive declaration is reminiscent of Waugh's 'win from anywhere' mentality - but without the superstars. Clarke would have looked foolish had WI batted even for another 30 mins in their 2nd innings but he backed his bowlers - even when they couldn't scythe through WI's 1st dig.
This sort of win instills confidence in a team that, even after being on the rack for much of the test, can force a result against the odds.
How did Lyon bowl in the 2nd innings Lango? I saw he was economical but got no poles.
I have been restrained to snippets of vision in highlights packages and interpreting about six feeds. From what I gather he bowled up to the mark but his batting ended up being his major contribution. Personal note: I've been in Sydney since the weekend, supporting my Dad through an operation.
ReplyDeletePunter has been made to look more ordinary than those of us who lambasted him could ever have imagined. Clarke has been outstanding from day one in his ability to make things happen and adapt and the players have responded. There is more to do and consistency and lasting tough sessions against quality is a major one - with bat more than ball. The t20 man is the major culprit. But they have the basis of a really good squad.
ReplyDeleteSome observations; as an Aussie, I love wins like these, it's what test cricket is all about. The competitiveness of the Windies is great too. However, as a cricket lover I feel a sense of dispondency over the fact that the next day the best two West Indian players were playing against each other in the 'lucrative' IPL. At the moment this could be their team - Gayle, Brathwaite, Bravo, Chanderpaul, Bravo , Pollard (yes he would be a test number 6 and useful bowler), Baugh, Sammy, Edwards, Narine, Roach - and that team would be world class. Clarke has had obvious leadership skills from day one. For example, if you read Symonds' book Clarke saved him more than once, but then he got his head turned by Lara B, something that happens to lots of us....and has learned an important lesson. The players really do see him as their leader. Lastly, I think that is the third or fourth important catch Sammy has dropped recently, so not the best hands...
ReplyDelete